| Notes (first edition)?: |
Monday, 24 July 2006
Hello Ross,
Well, I don't have good news at all. Taking your advice, I started to take the prints out of their frames and matting. However, not realizing what they did and thinking that the matting was stuck to the backing due to age, I tried to carefully pull the backing and matt apart on one of the prints. Unfortunately, I found out too late that they had heavily glued the matting to the print and I am pretty sure the print to the backing also. I am so very sad about this outcome. I will now put the one back together and will continue to display them both as beautiful art (without value).
I have attached a photo of the Saito watercolor print anyway… it is not a very high res and there is a little distortion in the photo but at least you can what it looks like. It is quite beautiful and hauntingly serene… it is really too bad they glued them both. |
|
| Artist Bio: |
Saito Hodo was a woodblock print and watercolour artist. His woodblock prints were published via Takemura Hideo in Yokohama in the early 1930s, and we therefore assume his watercolours also date to this period. His prints were simply signed with his 'gago' (artist pseudonym) 'Hodo', and sealed 'Ho', with no indication of the family name (as is usual practice). His watercolours are signed 'H. Saito', being his family name (Saito) plus the first initial of his gago 'H'. Initially there was no conclusive evidence that the woodblock print artist Hodo was the watercolour artist H. Saito, although the styles were very similar, and they both worked with the publisher Takemura. The 'missing link' finally came to me in the form of this watercolour and this woodblock print, where we can see they are signed as H. Saito and Hodo, respectively.
Interestingly, there was also another watercolour and woodblock print artist that published via Takemura: Nishimura Hodo. The style and subject matter of Nishimura prints is strikingly similar to that of Saito, to the point where one can reasonably assume they are one in the same artist. Now while it is not unusual for an artist to use different 'gagos' during their artistic career, it is highly unusual for an artist to change their family name, so there is still a possibility that Saito and Nishimura were two different artists. An alternative explanation is that perhaps Saito took on the family name of his wife when he married (assuming her family name was Nishimura; pure speculation of course, but not impossible). While not a common custom here in Japan, this still occasionally occurs today in the case where the wife's family has no male heir. Dated examples of Saito Hodo prints confirm the artist was active in 1933, and there are no prints with a later dating. Furthermore, the earliest dated example of a Nishimura print dates to around 1935, with dated publications continuing up until 1941. So Saito's adoption of the Nishimura name around 1934/35 would fit this scenario.
Yet another explanation is that the attribution of the "Nishimura" family name to the artist Hodo may simply be a mis-attribution, and we have all simply regurgitated this mistaken attribution to the point were it has become commonly accepted as fact. I can't remember ever seeing an artwork or publisher note that mentions the name "Nishimura" when referring to any of the Hodo prints, so I would be interested in hearing from any scholar or collector that can provide such a link.
|
|
